سوخت و ساز و فعالیت ورزشی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

سیاست دسترسی آزاد

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

سیاست شورای سردبیری و مجله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

اخبار و اعلانات

لینک صفحات مجله در شبکه های اجتماعی

راهنمای نویسندگان

فرم ها

راهنمای عضویت و ثبت داوری در Publons

لیست داوران سال 1401

لیست داوران سال 1400

مقایسه دو روش‌ تمرین مقاومتی 7/3 و کلاستر ست بر قدرت، ترکیب بدنی و عملکرد ورزشی بسکتبالیست‌های زن نیمه‌حرفه‌ای

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی Released under (CC BY-NC) license I Open Access I

نویسندگان

1 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس،تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف از این مطالعه بررسی تاثیر دو روش تمرین مقاومتی 7/3 و کلاسترست (CS) بر قدرت، ترکیب بدنی و عملکرد ورزشی بسکتبالیست‌های زن بود. روش کار: 21 زن بسکتبالیست (سن: 8/3±23/22سال؛ قد: 78/6±94/165؛ وزن:50/9±30/63کیلوگرم) بدون سابقه تمرینی در 6 ماه گذشته به طور تصادفی در سه گروه 7/3، CS و کنترل تقسیم شدند. گروه­های تجربی برنامه تمرین مقاومتی، را برای هشت هفته/3روز انجام دادند. ارزیابی­های پیش و پس از دوره­ی تمرین شامل اندازه­گیری ترکیب­بدنی؛ ارزیابی حداکثر قدرت و سنجش عملکرد ورزشی با آزمون­های توان بی­هوازی (RAST)، تکرار دو سرعت (RSA)، 10متر سرعت، چابکی (T-test)، پرش­CMJ و SJ بود. برای تعیین تفاوت معنا­داری بین گروه­ها، از روش Mixed model ANOVA 2 × 3 استفاده شد. یافته‌ها: قدرت پایین­تنه و بالاتنه گروه 7/3، افزایش معناداری نسبت به پیش­آزمون و گروه کنترل و در پرس­سینه و پرس­پا نسبت به گروه CS نشان داد. گروه CS در قدرت پایین­تنه افزایش معناداری داشت. هر دو گروه تجربی بهبود معناداری در CMJ و زمان T-test و 10متر سرعت نسبت به پیش­آزمون و گروه کنترل نشان دادند. در SJ افزایش معنادار به نفع گروه 7/3 نسبت به پیش­آزمون، گروه CS و کنترل بود و همچنین افزایش معنادار در SJ در مقایسه درون گروهی CS مشاهده شد. هیچ پروتکلی برRAST ، RSA و ترکیب­بدن تأثیر معنادار نداشت. نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به زمان کمتر برای صرف در هر جلسه و شدت پایین­تر تمرین و بنابراین احتمال آسیب کمتر، پروتکل 7/3 یک روش تمرین بدنسازی کارآمد برای افزایش حداکثر قدرت، سرعت، چابکی و پرش زنان بسکتبالیست است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of two resistance training methods, 3/7 and cluster set on strength, body composition and sports performance of semi-professional female basketball players

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Dehghanianfard@modares.ac.ir 1
  • Hamid AghaAlinejad 2
  • Mahdiye Molanouri shamsi 3

1 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: This study aims to investigate the impact of two training methods, 3/7 and cluster set (CS), on the strength, body composition, and athletic performance of female basketball players. Methodology: Twenty-one basketball players (age: 22.23±3.8 y; Height: 165.94±6.78 cm; weight: 63.30±9.50 kg), who had not engaged in resistance training for the past 6 months, were randomly divided into three groups: 3/7, CS, and a control group. The experimental groups followed an eight-week resistance training program (three sessions/week). Pre- and post-training assessments included measurements of body composition, evaluation of maximum strength, and various athletic performance tests such as Repeated Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST), Repeated-Sprint Ability (RSA), 10-m sprint, T-test agility, countermovement jumps (CMJ), and squat jump (SJ). To determine the significant difference between the groups, a 3 × 2 mixed model ANOVA was performed.  Results: The 3/7 group showed significant improvements in full body strength compared to the pre-test and control group. The CS group exhibited significant improvements in lower body strength. Both experimental groups showed significant improvements in CMJ, T-test time and 10-m sprint time compared to the pre-test and control group. In terms of SJ, the 3/7 group showed a significant improvement compared to the pre-test, CS group, and control group. However, no significant effects were observed on RAST, RSA, and body composition among the different protocols.  Conclusion: The 3/7 training protocol, with its shorter training time and lower intensity, proves to be an effective method for enhancing maximum strength, speed, agility, and jumping ability in female basketball players while minimizing the risk of injury.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • 3/7
  • Cluster set
  • maximum strength
  • body composition
  • Sport performance
مراجع
  1. Ahtiainen JP, Pakarinen A, Alen M, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K. Short vs. long rest period between the sets in hypertrophic resistance training: influence on muscle strength, size, and hormonal adaptations in trained men. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2005;19(3):572-82.
  2. Arazi H, Khanmohammadi A, Asadi A, Haff GG. The effect of resistance training set configuration on strength, power, and hormonal adaptation in female volleyball players. Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism. 2018;43(2):154-64.
  3. Asadi A, Ramírez-Campillo R. Effects of cluster vs. traditional plyometric training sets on maximal-intensity exercise performance. Medicina. 2016;52(1):41-5.
  4. Buresh R, Berg K, French J. The effect of resistive exercise rest interval on hormonal response, strength, and hypertrophy with training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2009;23(1):62-71.
  5. Çankaya C, Arabacı R, Kurt E, Doğan S, Erol S, Gürak AN, et al. Examining the effects of the pliometric (jump squat) exercise on vertical jump in female volleyball players. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science. 2018.
  6. Dinyer TK, Byrd MT, Garver MJ, Rickard AJ, Miller WM, Burns S, et al. Low-load vs. high-load resistance training to failure on one repetition maximum strength and body composition in untrained women. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2019;33(7):1737-44.
  7. Duchateau J, Stragier S, Baudry S, Carpentier A. Strength training: in search of optimal strategies to maximize neuromuscular performance. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. 2021;49(1):2-14.
  8. Figueiredo VC. Revisiting the roles of protein synthesis during skeletal muscle hypertrophy induced by exercise. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2019;317(5):R709-R18.
  9. Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Montalvo A, Latinjak A, Unnithan V. Physical characteristics of elite adolescent female basketball players and their relationship to match performance. Journal of human kinetics. 2016;53:167.
  10. Freitas de Salles B, Simao R, Miranda F, da Silva Novaes J, Lemos A, Willardson JM. Rest interval between sets in strength training. Sports medicine. 2009;39:765-77.
  11. Freitas TT, Calleja-González J, Alarcón F, Alcaraz PE. Acute effects of two different resistance circuit training protocols on performance and perceived exertion in semiprofessional basketball players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2016;30(2):407-14.
  12. Freitas TT, Calleja-González J, Carlos-Vivas J, Marín-Cascales E, Alcaraz PE. Short-term optimal load training vs a modified complex training in semi-professional basketball players. Journal of sports sciences. 2019;37(4):434-42.
  13. Hadzhiev N, Dzimbova T. Anthropometric and anaerobic characteristics of young basketball players. Journal of Physical education and Sport. 2020;20(2):707-12.
  14. Haff GG, Hobbs RT, Haff EE, Sands WA, Pierce KC, Stone MH. Cluster training: A novel method for introducing training program variation. Strength & Conditioning Journal. 2008;30(1):67-76.
  15. Hendarsin F, Mulyana RS, Doewes RI. Acute Effects of Complex Training on Power and Fatigue Index of Pencak Silat Athletes. Journal of Talent Development and Excellence. 2020;12(1):5619-29.
  16. Larsen MN, Krustrup P, Araújo Póvoas SC, Castagna C. Accuracy and reliability of the InBody 270 multi-frequency body composition analyser in 10-12-year-old children. Plos one. 2021;16(3):e0247362.
  17. Latorre Roman PA, Villar Macias FJ, García Pinillos F. Effects of a contrast training programme on jumping, sprinting and agility performance of prepubertal basketball players. Journal of sports sciences. 2018;36(7):802-8.
  18. Laurent C, Penzer F, Letroye B, Carpentier A, Baudry S, Duchateau J. Effect of a strength training method characterized by an incremental number of repetitions across sets and a very short rest interval. Science & sports. 2016;31(5):e115-e21.
  19. Legeard E. Force, entraînement et musculation: Editions Amphora; 2005.
  20. Mangine GT, Hoffman JR, Gonzalez AM, Townsend JR, Wells AJ, Jajtner AR, et al. The effect of training volume and intensity on improvements in muscular strength and size in resistance‐trained men. Physiological reports. 2015;3(8):e12472.
  21. McKendry J, Currier BS, Lim C, Mcleod JC, Thomas AC, Phillips SM. Nutritional supplements to support resistance exercise in countering the sarcopenia of aging. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):2057.
  22. Negra Y, Chaabene H, Hammami M, Hachana Y, Granacher U. Effects of high-velocity resistance training on athletic performance in prepuberal male soccer athletes. The journal of Strength & conditioning research. 2016;30(12):3290-7.
  23. Oliver JM, Jagim AR, Sanchez AC, Mardock MA, Kelly KA, Meredith HJ, et al. Greater gains in strength and power with intraset rest intervals in hypertrophic training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013;27(11):3116-31.
  24. Oliver JM, Kreutzer A, Jenke S, Phillips MD, Mitchell JB, Jones MT. Acute response to cluster sets in trained and untrained men. European journal of applied physiology. 2015;115:2383-93.
  25. Penzer F, Cabrol A, Baudry S, Duchateau J. Comparison of muscle activity and tissue oxygenation during strength training protocols that differ by their organisation, rest interval between sets, and volume. European journal of applied physiology. 2016;116:1795-806.
  26. Pojskic H, Sisic N, Separovic V, Sekulic D. Association between conditioning capacities and shooting performance in professional basketball players: an analysis of stationary and dynamic shooting skills. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2018;32(7):1981-92.
  27. Rahimi R, Qaderi M, Faraji H, Boroujerdi SS. Effects of very short rest periods on hormonal responses to resistance exercise in men. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010;24(7):1851-9.
  28. Seitz LB, Reyes A, Tran TT, de Villarreal ES, Haff GG. Increases in lower-body strength transfer positively to sprint performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports medicine. 2014;44:1693-702.
  29. Silva AF, Aghidemand MH, Kharatzadeh M, Ahmadi VK, Oliveira R, Clemente FM, et al. Effects of High-Intensity Resistance Training on Physical Fitness, Hormonal and Antioxidant Factors: A Randomized Controlled Study Conducted on Young Adult Male Soccer Players. Biology. 2022;11(6):909.
  30. Stragier S, Baudry S, Carpentier A, Duchateau J. Efficacy of a new strength training design: the 3/7 method. European journal of applied physiology. 2019;119:1093-104.
  31. Tufano JJ, Brown LE, Haff GG. Theoretical and practical aspects of different cluster set structures: a systematic review. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2017;31(3):848-67.
  32. Weber VM, Fernandes DZ, Vieira ER, Ferreira SA, da Silva DF, Queiroga MR. Adaptation of anaerobic field-based tests for wheelchair basketball athletes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2021;92(4):715-22.
  33. Yáñez-García JM, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Mora-Custodio R, González-Badillo JJ. Changes in muscle strength, jump, and sprint performance in young elite basketball players: The impact of combined high-speed resistance training and plyometrics. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2022;36(2):478-85.

 

سوخت و ساز و فعالیت ورزشی
دوره 14، شماره 1
اردیبهشت 1403
صفحه 76-95
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 23 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 20 آذر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 21 آذر 1402
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار